The Chinese stock market has displayed some intriguing volatility recently, catching the eyes of both seasoned investors and newcomers alikeWhile the broader A-share market experienced a slight decline, small-cap stocks faced significant dropsIn contrast, the China Securities Banking Index surged by 1.1%, reaching a new high for this round of reboundsThis movement prompted widespread speculation and frustration among investors, particularly towards the so-called "national team"—a term often used to refer to state-backed entities that intervene in the market to stabilize stock prices.

It is not uncommon for retail investors to express dissatisfaction when large financial institutions show preference towards specific sectors, in this case, banking stocksSome observers note that this reaction reflects a cognitive bias towards loss aversion, a principle in behavioral economics that suggests people tend to feel the pain of losses more acutely than the pleasure of equivalent gains

Advertisements

Many retail investors appear more discontent with their missed opportunities for profit rather than the actual rise of bank stocks themselvesThey end up blaming external factors for their own investment missteps, leading to a gap in understanding the market’s movements.

To illustrate this point, consider a casino scenario: the dealer clearly states they will be rolling high, yet some players stubbornly choose to bet lowWhen they incur losses, it is rather ironic for them to accuse the dealer of manipulationThe essential lesson for investors is to follow market trends rather than to resist them.

For everyday investors, jumping on the bandwagon when policy indicators, market trends, and fundamental logic point towards the blue chips is invariably a smarter choice than clinging fiercely to small-cap stocksWhen the examination curriculum directs focus on geometry, those who invest excessive time on algebra without catering to the exam's specific directions will likely face disappointing outcomes

Advertisements

In the same vein, sticking resolutely to small-cap stocks when the larger market dynamics favor established big players can lead to unfavorable returns.

The operations of capital markets are primarily guided by supply and demand dynamicsWhen significant funds clearly prefer a certain direction, aligning one’s strategy accordingly could yield profitable outcomesOn the flip side, being overly obstinate not only brings about greater risks but also leads to missed opportunities the market has to offer.

However, this is not to dismiss the investment potential that some small-cap stocks may holdPrudent investors, whether they engage in quantitative analysis or active management, can uncover gems within the small-cap spaceNevertheless, it does not mean that every small-cap stock will experience a meteoric rise simultaneously.

Investing, at its core, remains a game of probabilities, and increasing one’s success rate hinges on interpreting the market's heartbeat accurately, embracing clear policy directions and shifting funds correctly

Advertisements

For average investors, maintaining rationality and patience during critical market transitions is often more sensible than chasing short-term trading waves.

Rather than lamenting the market's perceived injustices, retail investors should consider adapting their strategies to align with clearer, more dependable policy pathsUltimately, in a market economy, the age-old principle of "survival of the fittest" holds true.

Reflecting on the development of the U.Sstock market provides additional contextThe improvement of the U.Seconomy should ideally bolster stock performance, particularly for stocks sensitive to economic fluctuations, such as those indexed in the Russell 2000. Surprisingly, this past Wednesday, the Russell 2000 index fell sharply, plunging by 4.39%. Meanwhile, the tech giants synonymous with the Nasdaq—characterized by their considerable cash reserves—find themselves less affected by interest rate cuts, thus their competitive edge is preserved during high-interest periods

• Nvidia Loses Nearly $600 Billion in Market Value
• Surge in Over-the-Counter Trading in the U.S.
• Dollar Crisis Looming
• Europe Lowers Interest Rate Expectations
• Surge in Foreign Rare Earth Mineral Production!

It raises questions about whether this recent panic-driven market activity can truly mark a decline in the Nasdaq-led uptick; the future performance remains to be seen in the following market sessions.

Interestingly, the Nasdaq 100 index has been rapidly reclaiming losses, boasting three significant upward movements recently.

In line with these developments, my weekly updates on asset momentum models remain optimistic about the Nasdaq's trajectory.

Nevertheless, I’ve recently encountered numerous inquiries about the substantial premiums associated with Nasdaq-focused ETFs, which have seen premiums ranging from 3% to 7%. For those who bought in early at lower premiums, they have enjoyed both net asset gains and premium advantages; however, for subsequent buyers, this has presented heightened risks.

Upon further exploration, I discovered an excellent alternative outside the stock exchange—the GF Nasdaq ETF external connection F share (021778). Unlike on-exchange ETFs that come with variable premiums and associated risks from narrowing spreads, these off-market shares involve net asset value purchases, completely avoiding such issues

The trade-off remains the slower redemption speed compared to ETFs, where liquidity is immediateYet, given the current high premiums, the stability of this external option seems a more favorable choice.

When discussing external funds, terms like A shares and C shares are common knowledge, yet F shares are a rarer breedThe GF F share has only recently been established as of August 14 this year and appears to be a direct sales offering from GF, not commonly found on major third-party platforms.

The fee structure resembles that of a low-cost index share, as the sales service fee is provided at a discounted rate of 10%. Consequently, there is no subscription fee involved, and the redemption fees align with a standard seven-day penalty, with no extra costs attached.

This product serves as a suitable option for standard weekly rotations, eliminating penalty fees as long as it is held for over a week—an arrangement that can reasonably extend durations beyond mere weekly adjustments.

It’s crucial, however, to note that amid discussions about Nasdaq-related QDII fund products, the focus should center on quotas rather than just fees